|
MAINS
: Sample Notes For General Studies
ECONOMICS
PLANNING
Most asked question - Critical Analysis of Planning in India:
It must include:-
- Planning strategy from 1951 to 1991.
- Problems it suffered.
- Planning strategy after 1991.
- Still the Public Sector has a pedestal role.
- Conclusion.
WHY PLANNING
For the possible remedies of the country's economic stagnation,
poverty and backwardness; state has to play a key role in economic
and social spheres. Planning is the instrument to carry out these
duties. It is the systematic and scientific utilization of available
resources to achieve national goals.
OBJECTIVE OF PLNNING
While the short-term objectives varied from plan
to plan, the long-term objectives of Indian planning
are based on the principle of high growth rate, social justice
and economic self-reliance.
STRATEGY OF INDIAN PLANNING
The strategy for Indian Planning is based on the principles of comprehensiveness,
balanced development and accelerated growth
to be achieved through the instrument of mixed economy. The 1990
crisis, however, brought some major changes in our strategy. Year
1991 was the watershed in the history of Indian planning. The key
components of strategy of planning in India included-
Comprehensive developmental planning: It included
policies for economic development as well as for institutional change
and cultural progress. The task was not merely to get better results
within the existing framework of economic and social institutions,
but also to remould and refashion these institutions so that they
contribute to the realization of wider and deeper social values.
Mixed Economy: Based on the coexistence of government
owned business enterprise with private enterprise. The Private Sector
was expected to observe national priorities in development, and
pay attention to not only private gain but also public good.
Priority development of Public Sector: Because
of strategic importance, non-profitability and high capital intensiveness
of certain areas of social and economic significance, private sector
was not expected to play a leading role. Idea was to let the public
sector occupy commanding heights of the economy and bring the private
sector effectively within the scope of planned development.
Accelerated growth: Equitable distribution of resources,
by itself, couldn't ensure a reasonable standard of living for masses.
Thus an accelerated tempo of development was sought after as a development
strategy.
Balanced development: Inter-Sectoral, Inter-regional
and equitable development of all classes and all sections viz. women
and children, was the focus of strategy through plans. While agriculture,
industry and services got a renewed thrust, attention was also paid
to the development of backward regions.
Emphasis on Employment: For a person without other
sources of income, right to work is in fact, the right to life.
Realizing this, the plan professed great concern for further employment
to utilize country's vast manpower resources and promote national
development and an equitable society.
The 1990 crisis brought a paradigm shift in our strategy,
from a closed to open system, and from independence to greater inter-dependence
(Rao-Manmohan Model). The major components of the model included
-
Liberalization of economy: It freed the economy
from major physical controls like industrial licensing, import restrictions
and foreign exchange controls besides restrictions on investments
etc, so that development and operation of economy is guided increasingly
by free market forces i.e. by prices and competition. Synergies
of both the public and private sector was to be realized in new
strategy.
Abandonment of the policy of priority development of Public
Sector: pre-liberalization period saw over-dependence on
the public sector. Majority of the budgetary allocations were meant
for this sector which had become increasingly inefficient and non-performer.
Liberalization put an equal emphasis on both the public and private
sectors.
Opened door to foreign private investment: Removed
most of the restrictions. A more vibrant role of the private sector
was recognized. Nevertheless the government has not formally given
up the objective of self-reliance looking at the shear size of the
country and welfare concerns.
Integration of economy which world economy: The
protectionist strategy gave way to competitive policies with gradual
integration with world economy. Removal of Quantative Restrictions,
partial convertibility of rupee and flow of capital has been increasingly
allowed. |